All Statements of Support
Steve Hopkins says,
Let's get moving! We have been distracted by the naysayers long enough. Hamilton needs to embrace this opportunity and get on with the business of city-building for the 21st century.
Simon Woodside says,
I commute regularly to Waterloo where my office is near the LRT line. There has been some disruption but it's worth it. We are going to harvest a major reward when the line is finished in terms of ease of access to our door for our customers.
I can't wait for the Hamilton LRT.
MARGERY/JAMES MUNN says,
WE SUPPORT THE LRT
--WE WOULD LIKE TO SEE A REDUCTION IN AUTOMOBILES ON OUR STREETS AND CITIZENS (YOUNG AND OLD )DEPENDENCE ON CARS DOWNTOWN HAMILTON NEEDS PEOPLE -IT IS BECOMING A GIANT PARKING LOT
WE COULD HAVE A HEALTHIER CITY WITH FAR LESS POLUTION AND A POPULATION THAT GETS A LITTLE MORE EXERCISE
CITIES BIG AND SMALL IN EUROPE HAVE LEARNED TO MOVE PEOPLE WITH EFFICIENCY BY USING LRT-- AND HAVE REDUCED POLUTION AS WELL
WE IN HAMILTON NEED TO FOLLOW THE EXAMPLE AS OTHER ONTARIO CITIES NEARBY HAVE DONE AND STOP DRAGGING OUR FEET--STUDYING AND INCREASING COSTS--AND GET ON WITH BEING THE "AMBITIOUS" CITY WE ONCQ)E WERE
CITY COUNCIL IN RECENT YEARS HAS STOPPED MANY EXCELLENT PROPOSALS THAT WOULD HAVE HELPED PUT HAMILTON BACK ON THE MAP
MAYBE WE NEED SOME NEW COUNCILLORS WITH FRESH NEW APPROACHES
Trevor Westerhoff says,
I ask that Hamilton City Council follow through with what they repeatedly voted for and graciously accept the funding provided by the Provincial Government for LRT. Further, I ask that Council and all Hamiltonians support the businesses affected by the construction.
Paul McAlister says,
Make the LRT the anchor project for the revitalisation of Hamilton. The other peieces will fall in round it!
Deborrah Sherman says,
Council already made the decision. It was the right decision. Act on it, and stop wasting valuable time and money on the second-guessing and progress blocking by a couple of self serving council members. Councilors come and go - LRT will be there long after they are gone, moving people through the city and improving our business and residential tax base. Aging mountain dwelling citizens like myself will probably never have occasion to use LRT, but my own addiction to car culture should not prevent current and future younger people from accessing affordable, efficient transit through the city. Times have changed - I know so many young people who have never had any interest in getting a driver's license or owning a car. They pay their taxes and they deserve an infrastructure that is relevant to their needs.
Claudia Leduc says,
I am 100% in favour of the LRT.Don't stall this recovery of our great city. DO THE RIGHT THING and embrace this opportunity.
Jeff Taylor says,
Lets get going with this project, never mind the "doom & gloom" brigade who always oppose change, look how we got stuck with that "Ivor Wind Tunnel" stadium instead of a new larger stadium in the West Harbour.I've seen many of these LRT systems working great in many towns & cities in Europe, the last being in Dublin where their east to west system works so well they are now installing another that goes north to south, a bright modern system with a pick up every 6 or 7 minutes!
Norma Moores says,
Tax payers money needs to be invested wisely for the good of the public. Bringing LRT to Hamilton is one of those investments improving access and mobilty choices. I live on the west mountain and although this transportation investment may not affect my day-to-day travel, I believe it will help the City meet egrowth targets from a sustainability, economic and social equity perspective. Say yes to LRT!
Jennifer Brasch says,
I am writing to add my voice to the many supporting LRT for Hamilton. It will be disruptive, first to traffic flow while it is built, and then leading to positive changes as people learn to move through Hamilton using LRT. This will be a positive change for Hamilton. Please move forwards with the LRT project without delay.
Peter Hill says,
As we move into the future, moving people efficiently and in an environmentally good way is imperative. We had a host of nay-sayers about the Linc some years ago but when I drove along it yesterday, I couldn't imagine all that traffic on our local roads! There will always be those who oppose but very often they have not thought of the broad issues which face us as we plan our cities. Such obstruction costs us all money as time delays do.
As Nike says, "Just do it!"
Nelly Sinclair says,
I am strongly in favour of the LRT. I have children who are young adults who have no intention of buying a car, and they want to live in a way that positively impacts the environment. Please support the younger generation by getting excellent public transport in the form of LRT.
Graham Jeffries says,
I am a supporter of the Hamilton LRT project. I moved to Hamilton for college after living in Calgary and Toronto and I immediately fell in love with the city. I decided to stay in Hamilton and invest as a community member, young career person, and a tax payer.
I rely on transit to live a comfortable life within budget. I find the HSR bus system along the Main and King corridor inefficient and untimely. With my experience riding LRT in Calgary I found the system consistently on time (a 5:10pm train came at 5:10pm). Rather than take the buses that were late and snarled in traffic, I would walk 20 minutes in -42C to the LRT. It was also very efficient at moving large volumes of people after Calgary Flames and Calgary Stampeders games, for whom I worked for. Seeing entire trains filled with fans was exciting and spirited too!
The system was very precise and not prone to interference with traffic. Delays were less than 15 minutes the vast majority of the time. It freed up the streets for emergency vehicles and a vibrant pedestrian mall and more places for public art. The C Train benefitted the businesses that surrounded the stations, each station having its own community and central node that sprung up. Some were arts and youth villages, others were malls and jump-offs to the warehouses by bus. It was very easy to navigate and get to places in Calgary purely by LRT, and now condos are springing up around the stations, adding to the tax base.
As a first year student at Mohawk I rented cheaply in downtown Hamilton. I routinely had two or three buses pass me, making me late for class. It became worth it to walk the 20 minutes to Macnab terminal to catch the buses that left on time. As a recent Mohawk graduate living in the Mohawk College area I had to purchase a car to get to my first career position, adding to congestion, hazards, and pollution. It was a 15 minute drive to work, a 55 minute to 1.5 hour bus ride, or a 35 minute bike ride from my home near Mohawk to my position in Ancaster. The HSR bus system in inefficient along the Main and King corridors due to traffic volume, on street parking, taxis, pedestrians, too many stops, as well as having to alight and manoeuvre for those in mobility devices, and traffic accidents. And it's only going to get worse!
With the increased population expectancy of Hamilton, the bus system is only going to experience more problems - more pollution, more expenses for more drivers, more congestion due to more buses and more people driving, more stress on already stretched tax dollars, and more adversity from developers.
I strongly support the LRT plan as well as a robust planning bylaw structure for mixed use and medium-to-high density along the LRT corridor. I believe it will benefit businesses, students and employees, traffic, the impoverished and disabled, the local economy, the sense of communities, tax revenue, and development.
susan labelle says,
I fully support moving forward with the LRT in Hamilton! Let's get, pardon the pun, moving! Let's do what is best for, not only, the future of our city, but our children's future!
Catherine Clase says,
I think that light rail has the potential to be transformative for Hamilton and the downtown. I know that many local businesses are concerned about the development phase. I found these thoughtful, informed, and concrete suggestions to mitigate disadvantage during this time at http://www.strongtowns.org/journal/2015/3/22/what-happens-to-small-businesses-during-light-rail-construction
1.Ensure that the government commits to dedicating a percentage of all project costs toward small business loans. This tactic was implemented in Salt Lake City with some success.
2.Unite local banks to create a dedicated loan fund for small businesses affected by construction. Albina Bank in Portland attempted this tactic, but, after failing to garner support from other banks, turned to a local community development financial institution (CDFI) to spearhead the project.
3.Create clear, meaningful channels of communication between local government and business leaders. In Salt Lake City, an independent contractor served as the main point of contact between the government and businesses. In Dallas, a North Central Task Force was created to oversee the light rail project, engaging members of the community and government.
4.Commit to keeping at least one sidewalk or street lane open for a majority of the project. During Portland’s light rail project, the government set guidelines that guaranteed this and other traffic flow goals possible.
Maddy Coulson says,
Why should we turn down a $1 billion investment? It's already been stated that should we not accept the funding it will go elsewhere- and this is something the Anti-LRT campaign is failing to inform people of. We can help mitigate climate change, and revitalize our city's core! I will be at the October 25th meeting and look forward to meeting with decision makers. Let's give this amazing opportunity the initiative it deserves!
John Connolly says,
This is simple: Every city that has introduced LRT into a deteriorated (or deteriorating) inner city and suburbs has seen nothing but improvement in the economy and the general well-being of the community. These communities also have other modes of public transportation so arguments that we already have buses is akin to saying that we do not need clean air because we already have clean water. Continuing to "make a case" for LRT for Hamilton is tiresome because common sense dictates that we need it. A vote against LRT is a vote against Hamilton.
Garry Sled says,
City Council needs to support their own commitments and actively support LRT. Too many councilors playing games with the city's future, harming the city at the expense of their own politics. Especially Mr. Whitehead.
Dermot Nolan says,
As a lifelong Hamiltonian who is proud of its past, passionate about its present and confident of its future - and as a downtown business owner whose business is located on King Street along the proposed LRT route and will be disrupted and who will be inconvenienced (as will my clients),by the LRT construction, I am unreservedly IN FAVOUR of the LRT project.
Having said that, there is one aspect of Hamilton's recent history that I am not proud of - its dithering when opportunity knocks.
This is a no-brainer. Please embrace it, make it the best you can make it and watch our city soar.
Edward Sernie says,
I am in support of the LRT proposal in Hamilton and urge you to support LRT -- to improve public transit in Hamilton and the GTA.
Kevin McNally says,
Good morning Mr Mayor and Councilors,
In light of the discussions regarding a referendum that have been going on in recent days and the upcoming meeting on October 25th, I feel compelled to write to you all again to re-iterate my support for the LRT project in Hamilton.
We have been debating the best type of transit upgrade for Hamilton for many years. Experts have weighed in and the Province has pledged funding.
There are certainly some unknowns, but as I suspect most of you are aware, unknowns are normal for large infrastructure projects like this and the unknowns in our case do not constitute a convincing argument to cancel the project.
Rather, I would expect that these unknowns would motivate a council (which has voted multiple times in favour of the project, as you all know) to step up, show leadership and work with the Project team to find answers and solutions which benefit Hamilton.
I find it counterproductive to fixate on unknowns (some of which are identified in the MOU with Metrolinx) and argue that because of the known unknowns, we should cancel the project. This does a disservice to Hamilton.
To return to the referendum, which admittedly looks increasingly less and less likely. A referendum at this point in the project will only serve to increase the misinformation and confusion in the public realm and will put the project on an unstable footing. When we are trying to execute a complicated and expensive project, we need clear messages from our council, not the specter of a referendum that would occur years into the implementation, be quite costly and likely not get enough voter turnout to actually drive a change. A referendum is a bad idea.
Lastly, regarding the changes that have occurred so that the line ends at the Queenston Circle. Again, rather then arguing that this constitutes a change that cannot be supported (which, incidentally implies that this change negates all of the other benefits from the LRT, an argument that current B-Line riders would no doubt disagree with) why not work with the Project team to find out where the budgets can be reduced and perhaps get the line back to Eastgate Square.
Thank you for your service and efforts to bring LRT to Hamilton. I am looking forward to the first ride!
Shelley McKay says,
LRT is vital for a vibrant, growing Hamilton. LRT has fostered revitalization in other cities. It's construction and completion will drive this City forward. I'm on board!
Sean Hurley says,
Hamilton is a city with high taxes and low incomes when compared with other Southern Ontario cities. Consequently, a larger proportion of income for many Hamiltonians goes to paying property taxes than in similar sized Ontario cities. On top of that, Hamilton faces a staggering infrastructure deficit of $195 million per year or $3.3 billion in total backlog for repairs to city owned infrastructure.
In a report headlined Hamilton: The unaffordable city, The Spectator reported that the backlog represents a 30 percent increase to property taxes. The long term debt, forecast to reach $885 million by 2019, represents $1,521 per resident in property taxes “just to upgrade aging water and sewer plants”.
"We don't have a spending problem, we have a revenue problem," Mayor Fred Eisenberger told The Spectator arguing property taxes alone can’t solve Hamilton’s infrastructure deficit.
Into this gloomy picture steps the Province of Ontario offering a substantial capital investment of $1 billion to build light rail transit (LRT) across the lower city. Included in the deal is almost $75 million in infrastructure improvements along the transit corridor including the replacement of ageing pipes and repaving the road surfaces. These are costs that would otherwise be borne by property taxpayers.
The Hamilton Community Foundation (HCF) in its 2015 Vital Signs report pointed out “Hamilton has the highest rate of workers in insecure employment with 57% of workers in this category.” LRT is forecast to produce 3,500 construction jobs directly in Hamilton and another 300 permanent jobs, directly in Hamilton, operating and maintaining LRT. That’s just the beginning. The redevelopment of the transit corridor with proper planning and zoning will spur investment and economic growth that will engender new employment and economic opportunities.
The potential for pedestrian traffic to and from LRT stations could completely transform the transit corridor creating new housing and retail opportunities. The transit developments taking place in Charlotte, NC, are an exciting indicator of the possibilities awaiting Hamilton: http://rebusinessonline.com/infill-transit-oriented-developments-are-driving-charlottes-retail-market/
Increased density and new commercial developments will further ease Mayor Eisenberg’s revenue problem by contributing to assessment growth without adding to the infrastructure deficit.
According the LRT Benefit and Cost Report, the transit project will contribute an increase of $443 million to Ontario’s GDP.
Hamilton could just invest in more buses, it is true. But HSR is paid for from the farebox and property taxes. What’s more, the old city of Hamilton pays a disproportionate share of the transit bill thanks to area ratings. The proposed $200 million bus barn, for example, would cost the property taxpayers of the old city of Hamilton, without any additional federal or provincial dollars, almost half the cost at $90 million.
It is not surprising, then, that pre-amalgamation city councillors are no more interested in increasing spending on transit than are pre-amalgamation suburban councillors. Without federal or provincial funds, or increases at the farebox, HSR improvements mean higher property taxes.
In short, the LRT investment reduces the infrastructure deficit, eases the revenue shortfall, increases employment, provides rapid transit without raising municipal taxes while sidestepping the thorny issue of area ratings, and grows the local economy.
For all of these reasons I am supporter of LRT. But not just those reasons. LRT means a reliable alternative for getting to work, cleaner air, friendlier and safer streets.
Those who oppose LRT may not be fully aware of it, but they arguing for higher property taxes for all the residents of Hamilton. And I would remind them that renters pay a disproportionate share of property taxes through their rent.
Thank you to the Councillors who continue to support this important project and for protecting our property tax dollars.
114 Kensington Ave North
Kathryn Newell says,
We elect our city Councillors to represent us. We elect them hoping that they keep our best interests in mind but also we expect good judgement on their decisions. I am disappointed when some of them are now exercising extreme resistance to a plan that has been in the works for 8 years. The LRT is not just beneficial for the downtown with better transit, it is also the beacon to improving a city that desperately needs a boost to its economy as well as keeping its reputation as the "Ambitious City". The economic runoff will bring a better life for us. I used to live downtown when it was great in the 70's. Now when I am there it is only to attend Hamilton Place. I probably won't be using the LRT but that doesn't mean I won't support it. I'm sure Toronto had growing pains when it decided to put in subway systems. Those didn't access all of the city at the beginning. I think the LRT is a great move our city needs to make. It's not going to access all of Hamilton but it is a good start, a billion dollars promised is better than none at all. Some other city will benefit from that if we don't seize the opportunity to become ambitious again.
Marnie Stout says,
Definitely in support of the LRT project, in spite of living in rural Hamilton. Certainly would be great to catch the train at McMaster and get to the East end of the city sans car....far faster than the bus, or car...no traffic or parking worries. Although many retailers are wailing about lost business revenue, I would suggest that they have a look at the Pearl District in Portland, or downtown Salt Lake, which has a ride free zone around the convention area. Buffalo NY has had the Metro Rail since 1984. Hop on hop off works well in European city centres, catering to tourists and locals alike. I would suggest Hamiltonians against LRT read Death and Life of Great American Cities, by Jane Jacobs.
Greg King says,
Hey tell Donna Skelly to get her butt out of her car and maybe try public transit?
We need LRT. Buses will NOT cover the needs of a badly needed system. Especially mac students like myself who need to get to school on time and with an overcrowded bus a good many times that was very unlikely!!
Aaron Bieber says,
I recently have moved to Hamilton and this is the first of this project. It is very important that based on the recent and predicted growth of the city, that transportation and infrastructure grow and improve with it.
This project is huge for Hamilton and the city can only benefit from the decision to say yes.
Brandon Corbett says,
I moved to Hamilton from Rochester N.Y. to attend McMaster University ten years ago. I urge the city council not to make the same mistakes Rochester made by failing to invest in city infrastructure. Downtown Rochester is a ghost town because downtown businesses could not compete with newer ones in the suburbs. One prime example of this is the Midtown Mall (once a major Rochester attraction) which closed in 2008 due to lack of customers. In my opinion, the LRT is ESSENTIAL to keep downtown businesses viable (such as those in Jackson Square Mall). We need this Hamilton.
Bruce Appleby says,
Yes I agree with the LRT
Juan Bonilla says,
I lived ten years ago in Bogota, Colombia. I have seen first hand how bus rapid transit, while a decent solution at first, would quickly become too little, too late. After the Transmilenio solution quickly became obsolete, Bogota is now -FINALLY- considering a Subway or an LRT. HAMILTON HAS THE CHANCE NOW to make a future-ready decision. GO LRT!